Home · How we test · Stock Analysis verification
Every figure published on feequity about stockanalysis.com traces to this record. Nothing on any page may state a number that does not appear here or in a dated first-party source listed at the bottom. The raw markdown record is also published unchanged.
Scope limit. Everything below was observed on a free account. Statements about what a paid plan contains are taken from the product's own pricing page, not from inside a paid account. That distinction is held throughout.
On this page
1 · Session conditions
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Anchor price, AAPL | $305.53 |
| Observed at | 15:24 EDT, 14 August 2026 |
| Account state | Logged in, free tier, no trial active |
The anchor price is load-bearing. Two percentages recorded below are computed by the product against the live price, so they only reconcile against this figure.
2 · Screener, counted by hand
| Item | Verified value |
|---|---|
| Total metrics | 313 across 29 categories |
| Locked on the free tier | 14, which is 4.47% of 313 |
| Marketing claim on the same product | 300+ indicators |
The claim holds. 313 counted against 300+ advertised. This is recorded because the method is to count first and report the result either way, not only when a claim fails.
What the 14 locked metrics are, by group
| Group | State on free |
|---|---|
| Fair Value | Locked in full · Lynch, Graham, both Upside figures, WACC |
| Top Analyst layer | All four locked |
| Ten year windows | Average PE, Dividend Growth and OCF Growth locked. 1Y, 3Y and 5Y free |
| Risk ratios | Sharpe and Sortino locked |
The pattern is worth stating plainly. The free tier is generous on breadth and gates on valuation output and long windows. That is a different shape of limit from a row cap or a results cap, and it affects a different kind of user.
Unresolved. Clicking any locked metric leads to the generic pricing page, and neither published plan states which one unlocks Fair Value. This could not be resolved from outside a paid account and is carried to section 9.
3 · Financial history and the second lock layer
| Item | Verified value |
|---|---|
| Financial statement history, free | Five years |
| 10Y and Max tabs | Both redirect to the pricing page |
| Second, less visible layer | Operating metrics tables gate older columns independently |
| Worked example | Gross Margin by Type readable back to March 2025 only |
The second layer matters more than the first. A reader who sees five years of income statement reasonably assumes five years applies everywhere. It does not. The operating metrics tables cut off far more recently, and nothing in the interface announces it.
4 · Pricing, as published · read at source 14 August 2026
| Plan | As displayed |
|---|---|
| Pro, annual | $79 a year, presented as $6.58 a month |
| Pro, monthly | $9.99 a month, stated on the same page as $119.88 a year |
| Saving, as printed by the product | $40.88 |
| Unlimited | $16.58 a month, billed annually |
The arithmetic checks out. 79 divided by 12 is 6.583. 9.99 multiplied by 12 is 119.88. 119.88 minus 79 is 40.88. All three figures the product prints are internally consistent, which is not the norm in this category and is worth saying.
Computed, not observed. 16.58 multiplied by 12 is $198.96 a year for Unlimited. The annual total was not displayed. It is marked as derived and is not published as an observed price.
Prices were read logged out and in a single country. No currency localisation test was run, so these are not stated as the price a given reader will see.
Refunds
| Item | Verified value |
|---|---|
| Stated policy | 60 day money back |
| Placement | Shown twice on the pricing page |
| Path | Cancel button in the account area, plus email to support |
| Merchant of record | Paddle |
This is published policy, not tested behaviour. Nobody has requested a refund and observed what happens. Until that exists, this site describes what the product publishes and does not describe how it performs. The same gap applies to every product covered here, none of which has been cancelled first-hand.
5 · Company data, AAPL
| Item | Verified value |
|---|---|
| FY2025 revenue | $416.16B |
| Agreement | Matches WarrenAI and matches the filing |
| TTM revenue | $466.82B |
| Analyst coverage | 46 analysts |
| Mean price target | $322.28 |
| Upside displayed | +5.48% |
The upside reconciles exactly. $322.28 against the anchor price of $305.53 is +5.482%. The percentage is computed off the live price, which also confirms the anchor timestamp in section 1.
6 · Coverage outside the US
Tested on adidas, Xetra listing, 15 August 2026.
| Item | Verified value |
|---|---|
| Page state | Full page returned, denominated in euros |
| Filings | German filings present |
| Analyst coverage | 30 analysts |
| Gap | No operating metrics tab |
| Gap | Volume unavailable |
Non-US coverage exists and is real, but it is thinner than the US page in two specific ways. Both are named above rather than summarised, because thinner without the specifics is not a checkable statement.
7 · Named data sources and one bug
| Surface | Sources named by the product |
|---|---|
| US company pages | S&P Global and CBOE |
| German company page | S&P Global and Financial Modeling Prep |
| Operating metrics | TipRanks |
The source set changes by geography and by module. A reader comparing a US figure to a German one is not comparing like with like, and the product does say so if you look for it.
Bug observed, 15 August 2026. In the ASML metrics, Value of Booked Systems appears duplicated. It is not present on AAPL. This is recorded as observed on one company on one date, with no claim about how widespread it is.
8 · Cross-product comparison, and its limits
| Figure | Stock Analysis | InvestingPro |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL mean price target | $322.28 · 14 Aug 2026 | $322.82 · 10 Aug 2026, and $322.28 on the sidebar · 11 Aug 2026 |
| Analyst count | 46 | 41 · 10 Aug 2026 |
| AAPL FY2025 revenue | $416.16B | $416.16B |
Read this carefully before relying on it. The targets were captured on different dates, so this is not a same-day comparison and is not presented as one. Analyst targets move.
What is notable is narrower. The target figure InvestingPro showed on its sidebar on 11 August, $322.28, is identical to the figure Stock Analysis showed on 14 August, while the analyst counts differ, 41 against 46. Identical means to two decimal places on the same company.
Two readings are open and neither is established. Either the two products draw on an overlapping estimate set and count contributors differently, or it is coincidence across dates. Nothing is published on this until both are read on the same day, on the same company, with both timestamps recorded. That task is in section 9.
A separate and firmer point, already recorded in the InvestingPro record: InvestingPro itself displayed $322.82, $322.53 and $322.28 across 10 and 11 August. The internal inconsistency inside one product is the stronger finding and does not depend on any cross-product claim.
Where the two agree, they agree exactly. FY2025 revenue matches to the cent between both products and the filing. That is the more common outcome and is recorded so that this record is not only a list of discrepancies.
9 · Open, not yet verified
Nothing below may be stated on any page until it is read at its source and recorded here.
- Which paid plan unlocks Fair Value. Unresolved from outside a paid account.
- A same-day capture of the AAPL analyst target and analyst count on both products, with both timestamps, to resolve section 8.
- Currency and country localisation of the published prices.
- Whether the 60 day refund performs as published, including reply time and elapsed time to the money arriving.
- Export limits on Pro, stated as one download a day on the pricing page and untested.
- Screener universe size. Not counted. The InvestingPro record has 152,080 and the Finviz count has 11,566, so this gap is visible in any comparison.
- Whether Stock Analysis accepts affiliates based in Israel.
10 · Figures deliberately not published
- $198.96 a year for Unlimited. Computed from the monthly figure and never displayed. Held here as a derivation only.
- Any statement about what a paid tier contains, beyond what the pricing page itself states. The account tested was free.
Sources read at source
| Source | Date read |
|---|---|
| stockanalysis.com company page, AAPL, logged in free | 14 August 2026 |
| stockanalysis.com screener, logged in free | 14 August 2026 |
| stockanalysis.com pricing page | 14 August 2026 |
| stockanalysis.com refund and cancellation terms | 14 August 2026 |
| stockanalysis.com company page, adidas, Xetra | 15 August 2026 |
| stockanalysis.com company page, ASML | 15 August 2026 |
Related
The equivalent record for the product that pays us is the InvestingPro verification record, counted on the same anchor company. The method behind both is on how we test, and errors found after publication are logged at corrections.
Maintained by Jacob Shasha · created 16 August 2026 from a session run 14 and 15 August 2026 · next re-check 12 November 2026